SCBE-AETHERMOORE
AI Red Team as a Service

We break your AI before the adversaries do.

A scoped evaluation that starts with a 91-case project regression corpus, adds tests for your system, and reports what the run actually finds. Indicative engagements: $5K–50K.

91-case project starting corpus Timeline set after scope Branded PDF report Mid-market focus

If you have deployed an LLM product -- a chatbot, an agent, or a RAG system -- you need evidence about how its actual integration behaves under adversarial input. The useful result is a reproducible finding tied to your system, not a generic security headline.

SCBE-AETHERMOORE includes a 91-case project-authored regression corpus organized by adversarial tier. Its 91/91 in-project result measures corpus fit, not transfer to a client application. A scoped engagement adds relevant cases and reports the observed misses, false positives, limitations, and remediation priorities.

What we test for

Four categories, dozens of sub-vectors each. Every finding reproducible, every vector mapped to your application.

Injection
🛡

Prompt injection

Direct prompt injection, indirect injection via retrieved documents, multi-turn drift attacks, and context poisoning through memory or session state.

Jailbreak
🔓

Jailbreaks

Persona hijacks, instruction-override attacks, role confusion, safety classifier bypass, and encoding-based evasion techniques.

Exfil
📤

Data exfiltration

System prompt extraction, training data leakage, PII recovery via inference attacks, and confidential context bleed across sessions.

Agent
🤖

Agent abuse

Tool misuse, privilege escalation through chained calls, infinite loops, cost bombs, and unauthorized lateral movement across connected systems.

The process

A four-week cycle is an indicative target for a bounded endpoint. The written scope controls the actual timeline.

1Week 1

Scoping

Kickoff call, threat model review, test suite selection. We learn what matters to you and which attack surfaces your architecture exposes.

2Week 2

Execution

Run the agreed project and system-specific cases against the scoped endpoint. Capture each request, response, evaluator decision, and uncertainty in structured output.

3Week 3

Analysis

Findings triaged and severity ranked. Remediation drafted against your stack. We filter the noise so you get the signal that matters.

4Week 4

Delivery

Branded PDF report, live walkthrough call with your engineering and security stakeholders, prioritized remediation roadmap delivered as markdown.

Three indicative scopes.

These bands help start a conversation. The final price, test count, timeline, and deliverables follow the written scope.

Quick Scan
$5,000
one-time engagement
  • Four-week target after access is ready
  • Project corpus plus agreed system-specific cases against one endpoint
  • Standard branded PDF report
  • Raw JSONL test output
  • Remediation roadmap
  • For startups and single-product validation
Book Quick Scan
Quarterly Retainer
$50,000
four engagements per year
  • Everything in Deep Engagement, quarterly
  • Drift monitoring between scheduled runs
  • Priority response to new attack patterns
  • Dedicated Slack channel
  • Named point of contact on our side
  • For enterprises with ongoing risk
Start Retainer

What you get

Every engagement ships with artifacts your engineering, security, and compliance teams can actually use.

✓

Branded PDF report

Your logo, your threat model, your priorities. Written to be read by engineering leadership, not just security specialists.

✓

Severity-ranked findings

Every finding gets a reproduction recipe: exact prompt, exact response, exact conditions. If we found it, you can reproduce it.

✓

Remediation roadmap

Prioritized fix list with code snippets where applicable. Patches, policy middleware, prompt hardening, output filters.

✓

Raw test output (JSONL)

Full structured output for your GRC and audit teams. Feed it to your SIEM, your compliance tooling, or your own dashboards.

✓

Live walkthrough call

Screen-share session with your engineering and security stakeholders. We walk every critical finding and answer questions live.

✓

30 days of follow-up

Email and async support while you implement fixes. We validate your patches against the original attack vectors at no extra charge.

Examples of the findings a scoped test can produce

These are illustrative scenarios, not claims about completed customer engagements. A real report contains only findings reproduced on the system under test.

Read the project-authored evidence, archived comparisons, and limitations →

Retail chatbot

31 prompt injection vectors, 4 critical

Customer-facing assistant leaked coupon logic and allowed arbitrary refund approvals through indirect injection via product reviews.

policy middleware with strict input/output separation

Code assistant

System prompt extractable via encoding trick

Base64-wrapped payload bypassed the model's refusal training and surfaced the full system prompt including vendor-specific guardrail instructions.

output filter with regex and semantic leakage detection

RAG system

Training data exfiltration via follow-up questions

Multi-turn questioning reconstructed verbatim chunks from the indexed corpus, including one document marked confidential in metadata.

query classifier + retrieval-time ACL enforcement

The technology underneath

SCBE-AETHERMOORE is the adversarial framework powering every engagement. Open-source core, patent-pending architecture.

91
Project regression cases
L1-L6
Adversarial tiers
14
Pipeline layers
Patent
USPTO #63/961,403

The project test taxonomy is organized in six tiers: L1 basic through L6 adversarial. Coverage varies by implementation and corpus; the current public evidence should be read as project-authored testing, not independent certification.

The core is open source. Inspect it, run it yourself, fork it. What we sell is the expertise, the curation, the reporting, and the remediation follow-through.

View the repo on GitHub See the real numbers (honest evidence ledger) →

Common questions

What LLMs do you test?
Text endpoints and agent surfaces can be evaluated after access, rate limits, data handling, and test compatibility are scoped.
How do we get you access?
API key plus endpoint URL, or sandbox credentials you provision. An NDA is signed before any keys are exchanged. Keys are rotated at the end of the engagement and we document every call we made during testing.
Is this disruptive to production?
The default plan uses a client-provided staging endpoint or replica. Production traffic is out of scope unless it is separately authorized and controlled.
Can we get the raw test data?
Yes. JSONL output is included at every tier -- Quick Scan, Deep Engagement, and Retainer. You own the data. Feed it to your GRC tooling, your SIEM, or your own audit process.
Do you find vulnerabilities in the LLM itself?
We find vulnerabilities in your application's use of the LLM. LLM vendor issues -- model weights, tokenizer bugs, training data contamination at the vendor level -- are out of scope. If we happen to find one we will flag it, but the engagement targets your deployment.

Book a scoping call

Thirty minutes. We walk your architecture, map the likely attack surface, and tell you honestly which tier fits. No hard sell, no obligation.

Book a scoping call Compare tiers